Skip to content

Benchmark evidence

A leaderboard that explains itself.

Compare center, tail, failure rate, cost and sample size. Rankings change with the workload; missing evidence stays visible instead of becoming a synthetic score.

Fastest median

895 ms

Tensorlake

Tightest tail

1.05×

Tensorlake · p99 / p50

Most reliable

100.0%

Blaxel

Lowest run cost

$0.00000

Tensorlake

Explore the evidence

Fastest median wall time first.

#ProviderMedianp95p99SuccessCostnSignal
01Tensorlake logoTensorlake
895 ms
939 ms100.0%$0.000003Early
02E2B logoE2B
967 ms
11.13 s92.7%$0.00009151High
03Blaxel logoblaxel
1.19 s
2.45 s100.0%$0.0000243Medium
04Declaw logodeclaw
1.83 s
3.95 s100.0%$0.0000352Medium
05Daytona logoDaytona
2.05 s
25.40 s100.0%$0.0000793Medium
06Vercel Sandbox logoVercel
3.05 s
17.46 s85.4%$0.00039103High
07CodeSandbox logoCodeSandbox
5.09 s
14.13 s97.7%$0.0000843Medium
08Dedalus logoDedalus
6.29 s
28.48 s92.3%$0.00009130High
09Sprites logoSprites
15.50 s
33.89 s91.3%$0.00033126High
Cloudflare logoCLOUDFLAREUntestedNone
Hopx logohopxUntestedNone
Modal logoModalUntestedNone
Northflank logoNorthflankUntestedNone
Runloop logoRUNLOOPUntestedNone
Missing percentiles stay empty—no synthetic fallback744 measured runs in view

Read the middle

Median is the normal experience. Use it for interactive startup and repeatable tool calls.

Read the tail

p95 and p99 expose jitter, queueing and slow recovery paths that averages hide.

Read the sample

Under 30 runs is directional. At 100+ runs the percentile shape becomes substantially more useful.